Sound Experiment 04
Today I decided to record some more natural sounds, this time seeing how the sound of wind would sound through a window before I recorded it outside, as I think the slight whistling noise through the window would make it sound more interesting, I am planning on collecting more natural sounds, but I wanted to see how it would sound before I progressed onwards in case the background noise was too much in comparison to the wind and ruined it. For the second sound for my second image, I wanted to continue to find something more sharper so I tried to record the sound of cactus spikes, particularly if I ran my fingers through it, as it makes a very sharp, high pitched sound that I think could work better, especially if I could replicate the sound to reflect the more smaller portions of the image. Lastly I wanted to try and collect a more electronic sound for image one, to match its sharp, electric colours so I wanted to start by recording a microwave, as I thought is humming noi
Hi Odette,
ReplyDeleteJust a quick point regarding using a 'quote within a quote'... you have Agutter talking about the skinny-dipping, but it comes from within an article written by Buxton. This is called 'secondary referencing' - in your in-text citation, you need to have both names and dates... see her under 'secondary referencing' -
https://www.uca.ac.uk/library/academic-support/harvard-referencing/
At the moment, it sounds as though Ms Buxton was the one doing the swimming...